Archive for the ‘ICC’ Category

No 1 ranking, Dhoni and new “consultant”

Sunday, December 6th, 2009

India is the no 1 ranked test team now with this win against Sri Lanka. I guess now the tough part begins - to maintain this ranking. But if some other team takes this away soon, it will be mostly due to that team’s results. This is because India doesn’t really have many tests planned until the next world cup. There is an away series against Bangladesh early next year and then I don’t know what’s next in tests.

With this win Dhoni now has gone his first 10 tests India’s captain without losing any yet. I first thought this might be a record already but then a quick search on Cricinfo Statsguru told me that Gavaskar had gone 18 matches like this when he started. Dhoni has been the main captain only for just over a year now after Kumble retired last year. Prior to that he led India as a stand-in captain a few times.

A couple of amusing news. After some decisions went against Sri Lanka in the third test Murali said the ICC needed to use the Umpire Decision Review System everywhere and not leave it to mutual choice as it is right now. On an unrelated note the use of UDRS irritated umpire Mark Benson so much in the second test between Australia and West Indies that he has decided to retire after this match. Tony Cozier then wrote that the review system doesn’t work.

BCCI has appointed Mike Young as a fielding consultant to the Indian team for three weeks. Mike Young is a former baseball coach. So I started wondering how he can coach the fielders to catch a ball without those mittens, whether he is going to make the fielders more efficient by asking them to not stop after running a batsman out, instead try to make the other batsman out as well (”not bother about that dead ball thing”) and whether he is going to pay any attention to the balls that are hit behind the wicket. But it seems he has been coaching the Australia team for a few years already and they turned out just fine. So we have nothing to worry about. In one of the documents referred on the Wikipedia page about him, he knows this much at least “The ball is about the same size (as the one used in Baseball) but harder…It’s been a real positive sport to be involved in and it is very popular. The players are tremendous athletes”. On the last statement there, do note that he was talking about the Australian fielders and not the Indians.

Premier test rivarly

Monday, October 20th, 2008

What a rivalry! If we count since the start of 2000 (just after the time when Australia had started their first streak of 16 wins in a row), Australia has lost only 12 matches, 6 of them are against India! If we don’t count the dead rubber games the lost games are 7 (which is an unbelievable record). Of those five are against India (Kolkata, Chennai in 2001, Adelaide in 2003, Perth earlier this year and now in Mohali). The loss at Mumbai in 2004 was after they had already won the series. The two other real losses of Australia were in the Ashes 2005 against England.

In Australia in the same duration, they have lost only 3 games, two of which were lost when the series was still open - both were against India. The third one was the Sydney dead rubber against England in 2003.

Compare this to 14 wins against 4 losses in Ashes for Australia, only two of which were when the series was still open, and it’s easier to decide which contest is the premier one in test cricket in this decade. And for those who still like to bring up the McGrath-Warne factor from time to time, India won the 2001 home series against Australia by beating them in the matches when these two played. England’s wins at Birmingham and Nottingham were when McGrath didn’t play. We won’t count Mumbai (2004), Leeds (2001) and Sydney (2003) in this, the series were already decided by then.

What does it unmask?

Tuesday, May 13th, 2008

What does the latest Harbhajan incident in IPL prove? What does it unmask that the Indian public didn’t know already? That Harbhajan is not the most well behaved player on the field? They didn’t know that already? Does it prove that he used that racial taunt against Symonds at Sydney without provocation? Don’t know what Ponting is trying to suggest here. Should we assume because of this slap that Harbhajan might have said what they claimed he said there? So if Symonds were to get into some controversy some time in future does it clear Harbhajan?

Does it say anything about the way Sachin backed Harbhajan? Absolutely not. All Sachin was saying then was he did not hear Harbhajan using the racial slur. Nobody was claiming what he did was right. He was wrong and so were Symonds, Ponting and many others.