Archive for June, 2006

No follow-ons!

Wednesday, June 28th, 2006

Nobody asks India to follow-on anymore. Not if there is enough time for them to bounce back like they did in Kolkata in 2001. How much impact can a single match have! Overall, as this piece on Rediff mentions, eight times the opponents have opted to bat again to set a target to India instead of asking to follow-on. Five of those instances are after the Kolkata game.

After Kolkata 2001, there was only once instance of India actually following on. Even in that case the opponent (New Zealand) asked India to bat again because the first innings ended on the fifth day morning, so the only chance New Zealand had of winning that match was to get India out quickly; and there was no away India could have batted out of that deficit and trouble New Zealand as there was no time left. In all other cases the opposing team chose to bat again and set them a target. Batting fourth, India lost all of these matches.

These incidences and there scorecards from the Cricinfo website

* Against West Indies in 2002

* Against England in 2002

* Against New Zealand in 2003-04, this was the only follow-on given to India after Kolkata 2001. It was again a hundred and a fifty from Laxman that saved India.

* Against Australia in 2004-05 at Bangalore

* Against Australia again in 2004-05 at Nagpur.

* And now in the third test against West Indies.

As against these, India found itself leading by more than 200 in five occasions in the same duration and four of those times it asked the opponent to follow-on. The only time it didn’t do that was against Australia at Sydney in 2003-04 when Australia had already 474 and Indian bowlers were tired, having already bowled 117 overs. In all other cases India enforced it and won the matches.

 

Another fourth innings chase

Sunday, June 25th, 2006

Only a day’s play left with West Indies’ innings still going on, Lara looking for a safe total to declare on and India’s innings not even started yet, this on a pitch not very bowler friendly. In similar situations involving other teams, this would have been a sure draw. But with India to bat on the last day, Lara must have looked at recent history and fancied his chances. This is the fifth incidence in last 18 months or so where India had to bat fourth with a large total to chase. Of the earlier four, only once India has survived.Here are India’s recent attempts to play out the last day:

Against Pak at Bangalore. 25/0 at the end of the fourth day. All out 214 on fifth.

Against Pak at Karachi. This was more difficult as India had to bat nearly two days and the target was more than 600. But India didn’t bother to wait till the fifth day and were all out for 265 on fourh itself.

Against England at Nagpur. England declared overnight at 297/3, leaving India 368 to chase on the last day or just survive the day. This time India not only survived but made a surprise attempt after tea to get to the target. What probably made the difference was 167 runs second wicket partnership between Jaffer and Dravid.

Against England at Mumbai. India 18/1 at the end of fourth day, chasing 313. The target was relatively smaller, but so was Indian’s total. All out for 100!

If Lara does give a reasonable challenge to Indian team, will they go for it or at least survive the day and keep the series open? Or here itself the chance of winning a series there after 35 years will be forgotten? Will be interesting to see.

Dada on BBC

Tuesday, June 20th, 2006

Saurav Ganguly gave an interview to BBC and just like many of his previous ones this is wonderful, with Dada tellings things very frankly as he thinks about them. Like the answer to the question about playing as a mere player and not a captain, his most answers seem very straight. That’s one thing I have always liked about Ganguly.